A network metaanalysis on the comparative efficacy of. When multiple interventions have been used and compared for the same disease and outcomes, network meta analysis also commonly referred to as a multiple treatment comparison meta analysis or mixed treatment meta analysis offers a set of methods to visualize and interpret the wider picture of the evidence and to understand the relative merits of these multiple interventions. Network metaanalysis swiss epidemiology winter school. It has usually been performed in a bayesian setting, but recently it has become possible in a frequentist setting using multivariate metaanalysis and metaregression, implemented in stata with mvmeta. For individual studies, important considerations include how patients were randomized to the treatments, whether both patients and outcome assessors were blind to the treatment and how missing data were handled.
Using structural equation modeling for network metaanalysis. As an alternative, indirect treatment comparisons provide useful evidence. The network graphs package in stata contains 8 commands that produce graphs for network meta analysis. Network meta analysis nma, also called multiple treatment meta analysis, or mixed treatment comparison, aims to synthesize the effect sizes of several studies that evaluate multiple interventions or treatments 14. Network metaanalysis nma, also termed multiple treatment metaanalysis or mixed treatment comparisons, was developed as an extension.
It addresses the comparative effectiveness of multiple treatment alternatives. In the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of quantitative assessment are necessary to establish which interventions are effective and costeffective. The simple term network metaanalysis includes all methods of synthesis encompassing extensive evidence, indirect comparisons, mixedtreatment comparison. The nma methods are largely divided into bayesian methods and frequentist methods.
Network meta analyses synthesise networks of direct and indirect comparisons of interventions, and enable researchers to simultaneously assess the effects of more than two interventions for the same condition. Thus, when planning a network metaanalysis, it is important to assess the effect modifiers and include traits such as average patient age, gender distribution, disease severity, and a wide range of other plausible features. Summary this chapter provides an overview of the concepts, assumptions and methods that relate to network meta. The summary of activated brain regions is presented in table 2.
Pdf on may 14, 20, edward j mills and others published demystifying trial networks and network metaanalysis find, read and cite all the research you. Chapter 11 network metaanalysis doing metaanalysis in r. A practical guide to network metaanalysis with examples and code in the evaluation of healthcare, rigorous methods of quantitative assessment are necessary to establish which interventions are effective and costeffective. Metaanalysis is a useful tool for combining evidence from multiple studies to estimate a pooled treatment effect.
The role of network metaanalysis in the evaluation of data the key principles of the statistical methods involved the key problems that can distort network metaanalyses enthusiasm for how network meta analysis might be applicable to your field. A network metaanalysis is an extension of pairwise metaanalysis that can synthesize evidence simultaneously from both direct and indirect treatment comparisons. Often when performing a meta analysis on the effectiveness of certain interventions, we are less interested in the question if one particular intervention is effective e. Network metaanalysis is an extension of standard pairwise metaanalysis by including multiple pairwise comparisons across a range of interventions it addresses the comparative effectiveness of multiple treatment alternatives. Network meta analysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies usually randomized trials comparing several treatments or interventions. A practical guide to network meta analysis with examples and code. Network meta analysis also called mixed treatment comparisons is a powerful statistical technique that combines different studies to perform the analysis of multiple treatments or to estimate an. Network metaanalysis for decision making will be of interest to decision makers, medical statisticians, health economists, and anyone involved in health technology assessment including the pharmaceutical industry.
Meta analytical results of the contrast of rumination vs. Network metaanalysis of antidepressants the lancet. These two statistical methods have different basic concepts for approaching the statistical model, but produce the same results if the sample size is large. There was no significant difference in anastomotic leak rate between the 4 approaches. Network metaanalysis, also called multiple treatments metaanalysis or mixed treatment comparisons, is a popular way to combine evidence on multiple studies. For answering this question, a promising method is network metaanalysis nma, which is an extension of pairwise metaanalysis that enables a. A network meta analysis is an extension of pairwise meta analysis that can synthesize evidence simultaneously from both direct and indirect treatment comparisons. An extension of metaanalysis, network metaanalysis, is becoming more commonly used as a way to simultaneously compare multiple treatments in a single analysis. Network meta analysis overcomes the limitations of traditional pairwise meta analysis by incorporating all available evidence into a general statistical framework for simultaneous comparisons of several treatments. The 248 networks metaanalyses were published between 2003 and. Many combinations of direct or indirect interactions. The use of network metaanalysis in clinical oncology. Network metaanalysis nma, also termed multiple treatment metaanalysis or mixed treatment comparisons, was developed as an extension of pairwise metaanalysis to allow comparisons of more than two interventions in a single, coherent analysis of all the relevant rcts. Apr 08, 2019 statistical approach of network meta analysis.
One of the most important questions that remain to be answered is which dietary approach offers the greatest bene. Package netmeta the comprehensive r archive network. Network metaanalysis is an extension of standard pairwise metaanalysis by including multiple pairwise comparisons across a range of interventions. Network metaanalysis to synthesize evidence for decision making. Data sources electronic databases ovid medline, cochrane clinical. An introduction to network metaanalysis mixed treatment. Pdf demystifying trial networks and network metaanalysis. A comparison of national guidelines for network metaanalysis. Network metaanalysis is a popular way to combine results from several studies usually randomized trials comparing several treatments or interventions. Mar 16, 2019 network meta analysis nma is an advanced technique in that it allows both direct comparisons as does pairwise meta analysis, but also indirect comparisons for treatments that have not been made in a headtohead format, and is recommended when competing interventions are used 20,21,22,23,24,25. Systematic evidence appraisal, but not the network meta analysis approach, was used to formulate recommendations in other recent, major. Enthusiasm for how network metaanalysis might be applicable to your field page 4. Pdf network metaanalysis is a technique for comparing multiple treatments simultaneously in a single analysis by combining direct and. Meta analysis methods 344 example of psychometric meta analysis 346 comparison of artifact correction with meta regression 348 sources of information about artifact values 349 how heterogeneity is assessed 349 reporting in psychometric meta analysis 350 concluding remarks 351 summary points 351 part 9.
Findings among 38 randomized clinical trials 8458 patients in this network meta analysis, mechanical bowel preparation with oral antibiotics was associated with the lowest rate of surgical site infections, reducing both incisional and organspace infections. Metaanalysis is important in oncological research to provide a more reliable answer to a clinical research question that was assessed in. Two new approaches for the visualisation of models for. Standard metaanalysis methods for clinical and epidemiological studies are widely used with focus on comparisons of two interventions, such as a drug versus. Comparative efficacy and acceptability of 21 antidepressant. In the conventional pairwise meta analysis, the researchers collect studies that evaluate the same treatment, create pairs of the treatment group and control group. Pdf on mar 14, 2018, erlend g faltinsen and others published network meta analysis.
Despite the variety of approaches available for presenting fitted models, ascertaining an intuitive understanding of. Using structural equation modeling for network meta analysis yukang tu and yunchun wu abstract background. Selection from network metaanalysis for decisionmaking book. Demystifying trial networks and network metaanalysis the bmj. Network metaanalysis for decisionmaking statistics in. Network metaanalysis an overview sciencedirect topics. Apr 09, 2019 network meta analysis nma is a statistical methodology that compares multiple interventions simultaneously by analysing studies making different comparisons in the same analysis. It has usually been performed in a bayesian setting, but recently it has become possible in a frequentist setting using multivariate meta analysis and meta regression, implemented in stata. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors versus placebo in patients with major depressive disorder. Network metaanalysis incorporating challenges and opportunities. The dropout rate is only shown for the individual drugs but the mean risk ratio is about 1, which, again.
Network metaanalysis of randomised trials of pharmacological. Introduction to network metaanalysis a network metaanalysis sometimes called mixed or multiple treatments metaanalysis is a method for comparing more than two interventions, some of which may not have been compared directly headtohead in the same study fig. An extension of meta analysis, network meta analysis, is becoming more commonly used as a way to simultaneously compare multiple treatments in a single analysis. May 12, 2020 network meta analysis compares multiple interventions simultaneously by analyzing studies making different comparisons in the same analysis. Network meta analyses of existing datasets make it possible to estimate comparative efficacy, summarise and interpret the wider picture of the evidence base, and to understand the relative merits of the multiple interventions. A network metaanalysis toolkit cochrane comparing multiple. Meta analysis and network meta analysis are only as good as the studies they are based on. Two new approaches for the visualisation of models for network. These graphs can be used to present the evidence base, the assumptions and the results of a network meta analysis and aim to make the methodology accessible also to nonstatisticians. Network metaanalysis provides a global estimate of comparative treatment. Meta analysis is a useful tool for combining evidence from multiple studies to estimate a pooled treatment effect. Petticrew et al 20 network meta analyses are best designed for. Network metaanalysis, also called multiple treatments metaanalysis or mixedtreatment comparisons, is a popular way to combine evidence on multiple studies. Two investigators identified the studies, abstracted data, and assessed the risk of bias independently.
1369 364 1289 1402 668 1270 1518 618 1377 330 577 167 834 977 99 821 276 305 1672 982 1329 977 386 995 677 588 1348 1217 862 338 408 401 1205 477 202 511 868 117 105